Q: How does Peopleisim fix the corrupt courts and deliver justice?
As in political, social and economic security & stability, Peopleisim employs the best practices of earlier Legal and Court systems, while eliminating the worst practices.
Sadly today “justice” in most courts reflects “just US”, protecting an exclusive few at the top of the banking chain and New World Order elite, who control the State. “LAW”, just as well stands for “Lots of Attorney Wages”. The amount of money litigants spend most often dictates the outcome of cases.
Problems With The Current Legal Systems Are Really Quite Obvious:
First and foremost is the simple fact that all the NWO Nations Central Banks are privately owned by an international criminal cartel, that literally makes money out of nothing. It does not take a rocket scientist to figure out that whoever makes money out of nothing, and is not held guilty of fraud, will own and control the judiciary, police, military, government, courts, corporations and even the church. The banksters control the state of the State.
Secondly, incentives in the current legal system are imbalanced. Just as professional politicians grow government, professionals in the legal system grow the courts to profit those in the legal business. Examples abound:
The longer it takes to litigate a case, the more bureaucracy and the more complex the code, the more opportunity, lawyers, judges and prosecutors have to make money off it.
Another classic case of corruption throughout history, is where Courts have authority to issue tickets & fines that benefit themselves or their colleagues and friends (Any fine issued under Peopleisim, is put in the General Fund and equally distributed to each and every Citizen).
Where the State hires prosecutors into the business of prosecution, naturally, they will drum up business for themselves.
By setting an ambulatory “bar”, or limit, for say blood-alcohol, policemen who have nothing better to do, can rush out and arrest anyone who passes the arbitrary limit, whether they are drunk or not and without even any element of a crime. Naturally the lawyers, judges, prosecutors and policemen all give themselves a lucrative income and jobs at the expense of their innocent victims. Even the medical professionals and experts involved profit from such non-crime racketeering & corruption.
The practices in BAR Association Courts violate even the most fundamental lessons law students are taught. The fact that every crime requires all three elements of a crime to be present (the Act, Intent & Damage), in order for it to be a crime, is very basic law. They even still teach students the Latin words for the three mandatory elements of a crime: ACTUS REUS - act of crime; MENS REA - wilful intent; CORPUS DELICTI - body of the crime, the actual damage.
However, most “crimes” prosecuted in BAR Association Courts are completely devoid of any damage or even intent. These include almost all the alcohol and drug charges, which make up a large share of cases in courts and prisoners in prisons. In fact, the very policemen, prosecutors, lawyers and judges who engage in the prosecution of non-crimes as crime, are themselves honorifically guilty of the most outrageous criminal act of criminal racketeering under the color of law.
Thirdly,where the State employs both the prosecutor and judge in a case, it automatically establishes bias in favour of the State. In addition to the crime of excess of jurisdiction on behalf of the judge. When the State maintains the exclusive right to prosecute, naturally there is no one to prevent & prosecute corruption by the State. Who controls the State? Naturally the owners of the banks who make money out of nothing.
Peopleisim Is Founded On Common Law, Verses Code Based Roman Law.
If one assembles the code-books covering the various disciplines from criminal law, through family-law, patent-law, customs-law, probate-law and any of the other fields, the code books used in BAR Association Courts and NWO Government Agencies reach higher than the ceiling. The New Word Order BAR Association legal system is far more voluminous and worse than even the Roman Law code. Not only do code-based legal systems become impossible to understand, they tend to contradict themselves.
Common Law is based on the principle of what the common person in a society understands between right and wrong, it is decided by a jury made of of qualified citizens who weigh up the merits of a case, and judge it by the precedence set by a societies common values and standards. The BAR Association masquerades a "societies common values and standards" with judicial decisions, which they present as precedence. In this way, judges and not the people, determine what is or is not acceptable in a society, in blatant violation of the very principle of Common Law.
Common Law's “innocent until proven guilty” verses Roman Law's “guilty until proven innocent”, is naturally one of Peopleisim's foundational tenants. It is important to note that the manner in which most of the accused are treated in NWO BAR Association Courts, more closely represents the Roman guilty-until-proven-innocent, lock-them-up on any allegation, including even hearsay, approach, than Common Law's innocent-until-proven-guilty.
The Peopleisim Protocols for Due-Process
Peopleisim introduces a mandatory Mediation Phase to traditional Common Law Due-Process. This helps increasing the overall speed, efficiency and economy of justice, while at the same time preserving the integrity and fairness of the justice system. In the Mediation Phase, Peopleisim effectively employs the efficiency of the BAR Association Courts (the old Chancery or Kings Court), with the overriding justice ensured by a peoples Common Law Court and impartial jury system. However, there need not be the typical delay in entering mediation verses waiting for a formal court date.
Naturally, Peopleisim employs modern communication and digital technology to completely revolutionize not only Due-Process, but to significantly increasing the the speed & efficiency of litigation while obliterating some of the greatest costs, delays and hindrances to litigation.
The Four phases to a case under the Peopleisim Protocol are:
- Optional Grand Jury Indictment
- Administrative Meeting
- Trial By Jury
A Grand Jury Indictment is however only necessary if there is a serious need for an arrest in a criminal case, where there is a very serious threat to life and limb.
No case may proceed without the parties to the case making an significant effort to sit down in an “Administrative Meeting”; an attempt to resolve the issues where the parties talk to each other. If the Administrative Meeting fails, the parties proceed into non-binding Mediation.
In mediation, hopefully the parties agree to and choose the same mediator, otherwise they choose their own, and their mediators talk to each other. During the Mediation phase, the parties to a case file their evidence and argument utilizing modern low cost digital communications technology. By the end of the Mediation phase, the parties to a case will have built their case, allowing the Mediators, who facilitate the process, to give sound recommendations that hopefully compel the parties to settle. Generally when all the evidence and argument in a case is written down, there is little reason for the parties to not settle.
If the Mediation fails, the parties proceed to Trial By Jury. Professional juries or randomly selected juries may be utilized, with defaults to establish a fair and qualified jury. As the cases are fully filed during Mediation, it allows jurors to examine the evidence and argument asynchronously in their own time, and where necessary, call for a synchronous examination.
The terms Asynchronous and Synchronous refer to how communications are carried out:
Asynchronous communications are carried out of sync, like email. That is the person sending a message or making a comment, records it in an email, voice message or video, and send it off in their own time. The person receiving the message can go through it and respond to it in their own time.
Synchronous communications are carried out with all the people together at once, so that they can all hear or see or read each other at the same time.
If a person refuses to respond to a formal Administration Meeting,
Mediation of Trial By Jury, naturally they are likely to loose the case
and have an award or order issued against them.
While the BAR Association and Judiciary are effectively abolished under Peopleisim, the roles of individuals Lawyers and Judges are effectively shifted.
The “old-boys-club” concept of exclusive legal counsel the BAR
Associations establish, is eliminated, and especially the concept of
lawyers being “Officers of the Court” is expressly prohibited (Which
also places a judge in the precarious position of excess of
jurisdiction). Under Peopleisim anyone may act as a counsel to a
litigant. As in any industry, the quality and nature of the counsellors
competence, is weighed up by regular legal standards of competence,
negligence or malpractice etc. Fortunately the concept of only allowing
Barristers to talk in a BAR Court has been prohibited in most nations,
however, when observing the behavior of the BAR Association Judiciary,
the net effect is that they tend to only listen to their BAR
Association colleagues and often completely ignore anyone who is not a
member of their club.
Understanding the origins of Common Law, Roman Law, the BAR Associations and New World Order Courts, will help anyone fully grasp the magnitude of the current problems in the courts and how Peopleisim solves these problems. We will provide a comprehensive article covering this topic shortly. Links to Wikipedia articles are provided in the mean time: Court of Common Pleas - Court of the Chancery
The role of the Judge in Peopleisim is effectively shifted to that of the Mediator, a far more pleasant and meaningful role, that not only eliminates corruption in the judiciary, it protects any individual who is placed in the often very tenuous and risky role of judge. In most cases where the worlds largest criminal cartels are challenged, the judges are either murdered or bought out.
Final adjudication is handed to a jury of twelve in criminal cases, or a smaller jury if civil litigants agree. Professional paid juries may be employed if both parties to a case agree, otherwise juries are randomly selected and qualified from the populous.
Corrupt judges in BAR Courts control the outcome of a trial by firstly rigging the jury and secondly limiting evidence in favor of their beneficiary (The State, Banksters, Masonic Gang or whoever pays them off). Under Peopleisim there are no prohibitions or limitations to the submission of evidence. A jury may however at any time they feel appropriate during a trial, issue a judgement and bring an end to the trial. Any person litigating a case, naturally needs to take into account the impact of hindering a case and wasting time by burdening a jury with nonsense. Jurors can fine the parties to a case. Jurors can however also be held liable for unfair or negligent judgements. Jury duty for Citizens is mandatory, however, it is counted as part of Citizen-Service. An appellate system employing the same jury based constructs is also provided. See the Due-Process Article 5 of the Universal Peopleisim Constitution for more information.
Incentives in Peopleisim's legal due-process, is balanced by forcing responsibility on the litigants, who largely have the speed at which a case can be litigated in their own hands, coupled with an incentive to cooperate in mediation with the big stick of a jury of Citizens held over them.
The time it takes to set up and offer an Administrative Meeting, is limited only by the person prosecuting the case. Certainly a respondent can refuse to come to an Administrative Meeting, however, this does not prohibit the person filing the case from proceeding to the next Mediation and Jury stages without the respondent and the respondent facing a judgement at the end.
The costs involved in prosecuting a case are tackled the same way Peopleisim eliminates banking charges and service fees by employing digital technology. However, a Peopleisim region who does not yet have access to the digital Citizen-Services provided under Peopleisim, can just as easily follow the same procedures manually. The evidence in addition to the arguments can be physically filed with a Mediator and handed over to a jury for trial. Generally speaking, when all the issues of a case are written down, the outcome of a case is usually easily determined by any Mediator. The risk litigants have of not settling in the Mediation phase is a ticked off jury who fines them for abuse of process.
Peopleisim shifts the paradigm of the legal system to a system that balances incentives, lowers costs and increases the speed of litigation, all while providing the maximum opportunity for justice.